Search Menu
  • Posts by Daniel Schleifstein
    Partner

    Dan is a Partner with PIB Law, and focuses his practice on the representation of financial institutions in connection with financial services-related litigation matters and labor and employment matters.

    Prior to joining PIB Law ...

On March 27, 2019, in a case handled by PIB, New Jersey’s Appellate Division affirmed a trial court decision denying the defendant’s eleventh-hour motion to vacate a sheriff’s sale and restrain delivery of the deed to a third-party purchaser predicated on a novel – but incorrect – theory that a reinstatement quote constituted a binding contract.  The decision is significant because, had Defendant’s argument been successful, it could have created the threat of potential litigation based solely upon routine communications between servicers and borrowers.

RSS RSS Feed

Recent Posts

Categories

Contributors

Archives

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience. Please know that by continuing to explore our website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.